google-site-verification: google6508e39c6ec03602.html The news

google-site-verification: google6508e39c6ec03602.html

Friday 12 January 2024

Jill Biden counters attacks on Joe's age, Hunter's trials


First lady Jill Biden defended attacks against her family in an interview on MSNBC aired Thursday as President Joe Biden’s campaign faces scrutiny in his fight to win reelection.

The president has received criticism over his age — he’s currently 81 and would be 86 by the end of a second term.

Jill Biden described her husband’s age as an “asset” to his presidency, citing his time in politics and relationships with other world leaders.

“I see his vigor, I see his energy, I see his passion every single day,” Jill Biden told “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezinski in the prerecorded interview. “He has wisdom, he has experience.”

Republican presidential hopefuls have targeted Joe Biden over his age. Former U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley launched a direct attack in a December campaign ad, declaring: “I’ll just say it: Biden’s too old.”

Former President Donald Trump has often referred to Biden as “Sleepy Joe” in speeches, although at 77, he’s only three and a half years younger.

Members of the GOP have also frequently brought up Hunter Biden’s legal woes in their strikes against his father.

The younger Biden made a surprise appearance on Capitol Hill Wednesday in front of the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, who gathered for two separate votes to hold him in contempt of Congress for going against a subpoena that would require him to sit for a closed-door interview.

“I think what they are doing to Hunter is cruel,” Jill Biden said. “I’m really proud of how Hunter has rebuilt his life after addiction. I love my son.”



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/pxoS3mX
via IFTTT

On the ballot in Taiwan: The global microchip supply chain

As the island heads to the polls, tech executives are watching the results closely.

from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/pxUhIse
via IFTTT

Thursday 11 January 2024

Menendez adds lawyer with corruption success at Supreme Court to legal team, seeks dismissal of charges


Indicted New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez has brought Yaakov Roth onto his legal team, adding a young but highly accomplished attorney who has successfully argued some of the country's biggest corruption cases before the Supreme Court.

The addition of Roth, disclosed in court papers Tuesday, seems to reinforce the Democratic senator's forceful denunciations of the criminal charges against him as a prosecutorial "hunting." Roth, a partner at Jones Day, represented former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell in his bribery case and argued on behalf of "Bridgegate" defendant Bridget Kelly and former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo aide Joseph Percoco at the Supreme Court — which overturned all three convictions.

On Wednesday, Menendez's lawyers also asked a federal judge to dismiss the charges, saying in court papers that prosecutors portray routine legislative activity as made-for-tabloids corruption or entirely unrelated to his elected office. The attorneys cited the McDonnell case, which narrowed the definition of corruption and was later used in the Bridgegate appeal.

"The government’s accusations in this case — that he sold his office and even sold out his nation — are outrageously false, and indeed distort reality," Menendez's attorneys wrote.

Roth did not immediately return a phone message seeking comment on his hiring by Menendez, but in a "40 under 40" feature by Bloomberg Law in 2021, he said he's "been troubled by the criminalization of politics and prosecutorial overreach in the political sphere." And that is the essence of Menendez's argument in his public comments following indictments alleging he accepted bribes and acted as an unregistered foreign agent.

On Tuesday, Menendez again proclaimed his innocence and said prosecutors' succession of indictments against him — one in September, and two superseding ones since — is a tactic to convict him in the court of public opinion.

"It opens a dangerous door for the Justice Department to take the normal engagement of members of Congress with a foreign government and to transform those engagements into a charge of being a foreign agent,” Menendez said.

Menendez's office did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment on Roth's hiring, which was first reported by Law360. The senator is schedule to go on trial in New York in May.

He has resisted calls to resign and has not said whether he'll seek reelection this year. But he's lost critical political support back home, and a primary race to succeed him is gearing up between New Jersey first lady Tammy Murphy and Rep. Andy Kim (D-N.J.).

This would be Menendez's second federal criminal trial. The first, in 2017, ended in a mistrial following allegations he did favors for a friend and political donor, Salomon Melgen.

In November, Menendez replaced longtime lawyer Abbe Lowell's firm with Avi Weitzman and Adam Fee of Paul Hastings LLP. Fee characterized the latest allegations against the senator — speaking favorably of Qatar in official proceedings to help a developer friend in New Jersey — as professional interactions that show "the lengths to which these hostile prosecutors will go to poison the public before a trial even begins."

In addition to the Qatar allegations, Menendez is accused of accepting cash, gold bars and a Mercedes-Benz for favors that helped three businesspeople, who have also been charged, and the government of Egypt. Menendez is also accused of secretly acting as an agent of the Egyptian government. His wife, Nadine Arslanian Menendez, has also been charged and, like her husband and the businesspeople, pleaded not guilty.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/WBx9cbn
via IFTTT

Vander Plaats defends DeSantis endorsement as ‘a good way to be a friend to Donald Trump’


Influential evangelical leader Bob Vander Plaats, who endorsed Florida governor Ron DeSantis in the GOP presidential primary, this week went to lengths to demonstrate his support for former president Donald Trump.

Vander Plaats, president and CEO of the Family Leader, in an op-ed published Tuesday in the Des Moines Register, said that Trump may very well win the Republican primary, though the sheer number of “Trump haters will never allow him to win the presidency.”

He added, though, that he will “remain a friend” to the former president even after endorsing the Florida governor, who is struggling to gain traction in the 2024 contest and consistently trails Trump in most polls.

“By Iowans choosing DeSantis on Caucus night, Jan. 15, we will launch a candidate who can win, not just the primary, but the presidency as well. And when he wins, we will launch a proven leader who has a record of confronting the bureaucracy and defeating its elitist agenda,” Vander Plaats wrote.

“A DeSantis presidency ensures justice for Trump,” he added.

Vander Plaats’ endorsement has been correct in every recent Iowa caucus; he backed Mike Huckabee in 2008, Rick Santorum in 2012 and Ted Cruz in 2016. All three won Iowa but went on to lose the primary.

Iowa’s popular Republican governor, Kim Reynolds, also endorsed DeSantis.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/7Kmgz8y
via IFTTT

Wednesday 10 January 2024

As Austin controversy widens, Republicans find a new weapon against Biden


Republicans seeking to attack President Joe Biden and his national security record headed into an election year just found more ammunition: his Pentagon chief.

GOP members on Capitol Hill are incensed that Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin was hospitalized for several days before the White House was informed. Now, with the 2024 presidential campaign ramping up and primary voting just weeks away, Republicans are using the episode to target Biden’s pressure points, painting the 81-year-old former Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair as unserious about national security and dangerously unaware of what’s happening right under his nose.

The bombardment, which is largely playing out in conservative media, comes as foreign policy — with global crises raging — takes on a larger role than usual in electoral politics.

Several prominent Republicans have already called for Austin to lose his job for keeping the White House in the dark for several days about his Jan. 1 hospitalization, and for Congress to hold hearings on the episode. But they’re also using the incident to frame the Biden administration as off its game as war rages in Ukraine and between Israel and Hamas.



Nikki Haley, when asked during a Fox News town hall about the issue on Monday, slammed Biden and touted her experience as South Carolina’s governor and ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump administration. She questioned why Biden is not speaking with his defense secretary every day.

“I think Biden should be fired,” Haley said. “This is unbelievable that we have a situation like this. When I had a crisis in South Carolina, if we were dealing with anything and I had to deal with my adjutant general, I was on the phone with him every day, twice a day. We have a war in Europe, we have a war in the Middle East, North Korea tested an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of hitting the United States, China is on the march."

“The one thing that keeps me up at night is what happens between now and Election Day because Biden is making the country very vulnerable and putting us at risk,” she added.

A day after former President Donald Trumpargued Austin should be sacked, a Trump ally, Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, said it was an indictment of Biden’s administration that neither he nor anyone else at the White House appeared to have noticed for days.

“It raises questions about Joe Biden’s competence or that he’s really in charge at the White House,” Cotton, a senior member of the Armed Services Committee, said Monday on Fox News.

With more Americans concerned about Biden’s age and cognitive health than Trump’s — despite the former president being just three years younger than the current commander in chief — Cotton took a jab there, too. Biden, the oldest sitting president in American history, would be 82 at the time of his second inauguration and 86 at the end of the term.

“It raises some troubling questions: If this administration would conceal a mere elective minor surgery for a Cabinet secretary, what might they be concealing about Joe Biden’s health,” Cotton said.

A spokesperson for the White House National Security Council did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Biden and his team have portrayed themselves as the adults in the room after the chaos and high turnover of the Trump administration. But the disorganization at the Pentagon has undermined that narrative.

Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), the Senate Armed Services Committee’s top Republican, appeared on Fox’s “America’s Newsroom” to argue the administration breached a statute that requires congressional leaders and certain government officials to be informed when the defense secretary is incapacitated. Congress was informed that Austin was hospitalized on Jan. 5, four days after he was admitted.

“There is a lot our adversaries are noticing about our lackadaisical approach toward the chain of command and having gaps in the authority,” Wicker said.

Wicker and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), a Republican hardliner on the House Armed Services Committee, are separately agitating for congressional hearings — which, if they happened, would stretch out the news cycle and shine a harsh spotlight on the embarrassing episode.

“The DoD’s failure to inform the White House, Congress, and the American People of Secretary Austin’s incapacitation reflects the lack of leadership, competency, and transparency throughout the entire Biden administration,” Gaetz wrote in a post.

On Fox, Wicker called on Senate Armed Services Chair Jack Reed (D-R.I.), and House Armed Services Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) to hold hearings.

“This is an indictment of the administration’s attitude toward public disclosure and full transparency,” Wicker said. “They have commissioned a 30-day internal review. That is not going to be adequate. If we want to have a review, it needs to be done by an outside inspector general, and they should come before us for a hearing.”

Austin, who remains hospitalized as of Tuesday afternoon, has acknowledged that he came up short in disclosing his hospitalization, though a variety of questions remain.

Austin’s chief of staff, Kelly Magsamen, on Monday directed a 30-day review into his hospitalization and the process of notifying higher-ups. Biden is standing by Austin, and his job doesn’t appear to be in danger at the moment.

But the incident has turned into a political headache for the Pentagon and White House that threatens to distract from their immediate agenda of hammering out a compromise aid package for Ukraine and Israel and funding the government in the coming weeks.

Even Democrats are upset over the dustup and want more information, though many have batted down the most aggressive GOP calls for Austin’s ouster. Some also downplayed the need for a public hearing.

"I think we deserve an explanation. And I think that Secretary Austin will provide one very soon, and then we can decide whether we should have a hearing,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). “But I fully support him. I would reject calls for his resignation."

Progressive Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) rebuffed calls for a hearing as political theater by Republicans.

"Some Republicans want to play politics 24/7," Warren said.

"He has taken full responsibility for this and I'm quite certain it will never happen again,” she said of Austin.

Two Democratic senators running on their national security credentials — Senate Armed Services Readiness Subcommittee Chair Tim Kaine (D-Va.) and Senate Appropriations Defense Subcommittee Chair Jon Tester (D-Mont.) — are among lawmakers who have voiced criticism.

“It's just something that can't happen again,” Kaine told reporters on Monday. “I'm troubled by it and the explanation of it, but it just needs to be fixed so it won't happen again.”

Tester, in a brief interview, said Austin “needs to be talked to.”

Anthony Adragna, Jennifer Scholtes and Ursula Perano contributed to this report.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/JHYOoLC
via IFTTT

Don Lemon announces comeback, new show on X


Former CNN anchor Don Lemon announced Tuesday he is launching a show on X, formerly Twitter, becoming the latest media personality to launch a comeback on the social media platform in the wake of a fall from grace.

“I’ve heard you … and today I am back bigger, bolder, freer!” Lemon said in a post on X Tuesday. “My new media company’s first project is The Don Lemon Show. It will be available to everyone, easily, whenever you want it, streaming on the platforms where the conversations are happening.”

The show, Lemon continued, would be found “first on X, the biggest space for free speech in the world.”

Lemon was axed from CNN in April 2023 after a series of panned on-air remarks and a report from Variety that recounted an alleged pattern of misogynistic behavior toward colleagues at the network dating back at least 15 years. A spokesperson for Lemon at the time blasted the report in a statement to Yahoo News as "patently false" and "based on unsourced, unsubstantiated, 15-year-old anonymous gossip."

He's not the first media personality to turn to X as a landing ground: Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who was fired the same day as Lemon, also launched a show on the social media platform titled “Tucker on X” in June of last year.

That venture has proved successful for Carlson, who has interviewed high-profile guests on his social media show, including former President Donald Trump and X owner Elon Musk. Musk has claimed in posts on social media that Carlson’s show’s viewership exceeds the population of the United States. Carlson has also launched his own streaming service, the “Tucker Carlson Network.”

Carlson celebrated Lemon’s arrival to the platform Tuesday, posting on X: “Congratulations. It’s a new world. Welcome.”



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/C2OrET3
via IFTTT

Ray Epps, pro-Trump rioter smeared by conspiracy theories, gets probation for role in Capitol riot


A Jan. 6 rioter who was falsely accused by Donald Trump of being a government agent was sentenced Tuesday to a year of probation for his actions during the attack on the Capitol.

The sentence of Ray Epps is more lenient than the six months of prison time that prosecutors requested. And it marks the conclusion of one of the strangest Jan. 6 subplots: the saga of Epps, a former Oath Keeper from Arizona who was among the first pro-Trump rioters to breach police barricades and then became the target of far-right conspiracy theories.

Epps received death threats after Republican members of Congress and conservative media spread false claims that he was an undercover agent who helped incite the Capitol riot. Those claims were even echoed by Trump — who on Tuesday sat in the same courthouse listening to arguments in one of his own criminal cases at the same time that Epps was being sentenced.

“This is not an easy sentencing,” said Chief Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. district court in Washington. Boasberg noted that Epps knowingly joined a mob and entered a walled-off area on the day of attack — but then confessed to law enforcement, helped congressional investigators, and saw his life upended by the conspiracy theories.

James “Ray” Epps, a former Marine who ran a wedding venue in Arizona, traveled to Washington for the Jan. 6, 2021, certification of the Electoral College results. On Jan. 5, he told rowdy Trump supporters that they needed to “go to the Capitol” the next day. An attendee videotaped his comments and captured people in the crowd chanting “Fed! Fed! Fed!” at him.

During the Trump rally that preceded the electoral count, Epps told attendees they should march to the Capitol. And right before another defendant, Ryan Samsel, engaged in one of the day’s first acts of violence, Epps whispered in his ear.

Epps traveled with the mob as it turned violent — sometimes trying to quell violence, sometimes not. Prosecutors did not accuse him of having any physical contact with police officers or of entering the Capitol building itself. But, they wrote in a sentencing memo, “[e]ven if Epps did not physically touch law enforcement officers or go inside of the building, he undoubtedly engaged in collective aggressive conduct.”



Epps’ lawyer, meanwhile, pushed back on any suggestion that Epps was violent that day.

In court papers, Epps described chilling harassment after pro-Trump media commentators suggested he could have been planted in the crowd by FBI agents to incite violence and embarrass the Trump movement: a busload of Trump supporters driving past his wedding venue during nuptial ceremonies and shouting threats, shell casings appearing on his property, and strangers telling him in person to “sleep with one eye open.” Epps said the harassment forced him and his wife to sell their business and move to another state.

Epps and the Justice Department reached a deal where he pled guilty to one misdemeanor count: disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds. The charge carried a maximum prison sentence of one year.

Epps argued he should just receive probation. Prosecutors, meanwhile, argued that he bore partial responsibility for the day’s violence and thus deserved six months in prison.

But in his first words at the sentencing hearing, prosecutor Mike Gordon conceded that Epps was both a defendant and a victim. Gordon’s first sentence to the judge: “Ray Epps has been unfairly scapegoated.”

“His life has been destroyed by conspiracy theorists eager to blame the government for the violence on January 6,” he added moments later.

Gordon then played video of Epps telling protesters on Jan. 5 that they should go into the Capitol, and video of him moving his hands toward a large, heavy sign that later injured police officers.

Boasberg called Gordon’s evidence about that sign “somewhat equivocal,” and said the intimation that he was a leader on Jan. 6 was a “vast overstatement.” But the judge added that Epps’ decision to trespass on territory he knew was off-limits was “serious,” and may have warranted jail time without mitigating circumstances.

For Epps, though, mitigating circumstances were abundant. Boasberg told Epps he was the only Jan. 6 defendant to suffer “for what you didn’t do” — in other words, the only defendant to face threats and harassment because powerful people lied about his actions that day. Boasberg also noted Epps’ early remorse and longtime community service.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/I6vfmJQ
via IFTTT