google-site-verification: google6508e39c6ec03602.html The news

google-site-verification: google6508e39c6ec03602.html

Thursday 4 May 2023

California lawmaker running for Congress is arrested for drunk driving


A California Democratic lawmaker running for a battleground congressional seat in Orange County has been arrested for drunk driving.

State Sen. Dave Min, who was arrested Tuesday night in Sacramento, confirmed the arrest in a statement.

“Last night I received a misdemeanor for driving under the influence. My decision to drive last night was irresponsible,” Min said. “I accept full responsibility and there is no excuse for my actions."

Min was pulled over near the state Capitol by the California Highway Patrol when he drove through a red light with his headlights off, according to the arrest report.

Officers conducted a DUI test and arrested him on suspicion of driving with a blood alcohol level above the legal limit. He was booked into the Sacramento County jail and released Wednesday.

Min, who is running for the seat held by Democratic Rep. Katie Porter, apologized for the incident.

"To my family, constituents and supporters, I am so deeply sorry. I know I need to do better," he said. "I will not let this personal failure distract from our work in California and in Washington."

Min is running to replace outgoing Porter in an Orange County district that will be one of the most competitive seats in the 2024 cycle. Porter narrowly defended the 47th Congressional District in 2022 but has given up the seat to run for Senate and endorsed Min as her successor.

Min has secured some key endorsements and raised more than $520,000 in the first quarter of 2023 as Democrats look to defend a seat that could be key to reclaiming the House.

Min is not the only Democrat in the race: He’s contending against Women for American Values and Ethics founder Joanna Weiss. Former Rep. Harley Rouda dropped out of the contest in April.

Lara Korte contributed to this report.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/UNXmwHu
via IFTTT

Coinbase squares off with Washington’s top crypto skeptic


When Brian Armstrong and Fred Ehrsam launched Coinbase more than a decade ago, they made an unconventional choice for a startup in the libertarian-leaning cryptocurrency market: They would embrace, not reject, regulation.

Now, Coinbase is going to war with Washington’s top financial cop.

In the five weeks since the Gary Gensler-led Securities and Exchange Commission warned that it was poised to bring charges against the company, Coinbase — the largest U.S. crypto exchange — has gone on the offensive.

Armstrong, the chief executive, has threatened to move Coinbase out of the U.S. The company brought aboard corporate America’s go-to SEC challenger, former Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia, to lead a lawsuit against the agency filed on April 24. And, just days later, Coinbase took the rare step of publicly releasing its official rebuttal to the SEC, in which the company called itself “a well-resourced adversary.”

“The reality is that the law today does not apply to vast swaths of the digital asset market,” Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal said Thursday in an interview. “We don’t relish the opportunity to be in court with an important regulator, the SEC. But we will stand up for the rule of law as it currently exists, not just for Coinbase but the entire industry.”

Coinbase’s blitz against the SEC offers a prelude to what could be the crypto market’s biggest showdown yet. Over the last two years, the two have been locking horns over the exchange’s operations and crypto regulation more broadly. Yet if the SEC brings charges as expected, the case would represent the biggest test to date of Gensler’s tough stance toward the $1 trillion crypto market as well as a potential threat to Coinbase’s business — and the crypto market’s future in the U.S.

“Everything is on the line,” said Emily Garnett, a former SEC attorney who is now a shareholder at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck.

An SEC spokesperson declined to comment.

Under Gensler, who was sworn in as chair just days after Coinbase went public two years ago, the SEC has been aggressively cracking down on the crypto market’s gatekeepers. But the enforcement campaign took on new speed after Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX, the once-lionized crypto exchange, collapsed late last year.

Since then, the SEC has brought a range of crypto-related cases against everyone from celebrities like Lindsay Lohan to digital asset giants such as Gemini and Kraken. Its campaign has been part of a broader and relatively new skepticism toward crypto in Washington. Lawmakers have hit pause on some crypto legislative efforts, bank regulators have ratcheted up their warnings about the market and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission even recently went after Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange.

The Coinbase case, however, would stand apart.

Coinbase has long been seen in crypto circles as a leader in regulatory compliance after acquiring an array of state and federal licenses in its early days. But the SEC’s expected charges against the company signal that few are immune from Gensler's crackdown.

In the agency's so-called Wells notice to the company, the SEC indicated that it was preparing a "kitchen sink" of charges against Coinbase's businesses, said J.W. Verret, a law professor at George Mason University. That includes its staking service, wallet product and the exchange itself, which represents a pillar of Coinbase’s business that generated about 74 percent of total revenue in 2022.

Gensler says much of the crypto market consists of tokens that are akin to stocks and bonds, so companies trading or listing them need to be registered with the agency — just as if they were the New York Stock Exchange or Charles Schwab.

“Crypto markets suffer from a lack of regulatory compliance,” he said in a video posted online Thursday that did not mention Coinbase. “It’s not a lack of regulatory clarity.”

But Coinbase denies that it deals in securities. In its official response to the Wells notice, the company pointed to its “robust listing process” that screens tokens and rejects about 90 percent of assets reviewed.

Coinbase went further to say that the SEC’s looming charges would be an “abrupt about-face” from when the agency signed off on the company’s paperwork to go public in April 2021. The approval, Coinbase argued, allowed investors to infer that the SEC took no issue with its core business. The response was written by Steven Peikin, an attorney at Sullivan & Cromwell representing Coinbase who previously served as the SEC’s co-head of enforcement.

“It makes little or no sense that now — two years after the fact — we would find ourselves staring at a Wells notice,” Grewal said.

An SEC official who was granted anonymity to speak freely about agency processes said the SEC’s review of a company's registration statement generally looks at the relevant disclosure and accounting laws, not the underlying business' merits.

The SEC has appeared recently to be building up a foundation for the Coinbase action, though, securities lawyers say.

Notably, the agency has alleged in other cases that certain tokens trading on Coinbase are securities. And it has sued other crypto exchanges like Bittrex for allegedly running an unregistered national securities exchange, broker-dealer and clearing agency. Bittrex, which had previously announced plans to leave the U.S., said it will fight the litigation. The SEC filed a similar case the previous month against another crypto platform called Beaxy.com.

But crypto advocates are expressing hope that Coinbase — given the company’s profile, resources and willingness to fight the SEC — could win as the case moves through the courts.

“It’s always an uphill climb when a regulator brings a lawsuit,” said Marisa Tashman Coppel, policy counsel at the Blockchain Association. “But none of the cases have gone up to the Court of Appeals and none of them have gone up to the Supreme Court. So, I am optimistic.”



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/CRoxJAB
via IFTTT

World Bank taps Banga as next leader


Ajay Banga has been chosen to serve as the next president of the World Bank, taking over the global finance institution as it strives to help low-income countries overcome debt and combat climate change.

The bank’s 25-member executive board voted in favor of Banga on Wednesday after the former Mastercard executive traveled the globe in recent weeks to shore up support. President Joe Biden nominated him for the post in February and he was the only contender for the job.

His five-year term will begin June 2, the World Bank said in a press release.

Banga's selection was not unanimous. Russia, which had previously said it was considering putting forward its own candidate for the job but ultimately did not, abstained from the vote, said a person close to the selection process. A senior administration official said the board's votes are "strictly confidential" but that Banga was "elected with resounding approval."

The position of World Bank president traditionally goes to an American citizen. Banga holds U.S. citizenship but was born and raised in India.

Banga will now oversee the World Bank’s pivot as it aims to become a dominant player in climate finance and help low-income economies bankroll the transition to cleaner energy sources and manufacturing processes.

But those priorities will cost trillions of dollars that shareholders like the U.S. and European Union are not eager to spend at the moment. What’s more, the bank must also contend with other pressing needs facing the world’s poorest countries, including rising food insecurity and unsustainable levels of debt.

“Ajay understands that the challenges we face — from combating climate change, pandemics, and fragility to eliminating extreme poverty and promoting shared prosperity — are deeply intertwined,” Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said in a statement.

The bank has begun adopting reforms that will “sharpen” its mission, Yellen continued, adding that “our ambitious goals will not be met overnight, and we remain committed to a staged adoption of reforms over the course of the year to build on the vision we have laid out.”

The White House recognizes that the World Bank faces a pivotal moment as countries face concerning levels of debt and the global economy continues to contend with the effects of the coronavirus pandemic and Russia's war in Ukraine, a second senior administration official told reporters Wednesday.

"Getting the evolution of the World Bank right is absolutely critical to meeting the moment," the second official said, adding that Biden believes Banga "has the track record and the know how to rise to the occasion and make sure the World Bank delivers for the globe."

Banga was the president and chief executive officer of credit card giant Mastercard from 2010 to 2020 and remained the company’s executive chairman for a year after that. He left to join General Atlantic, one of the world’s largest private equity firms, where he served as vice chairman.

The World Bank’s current president, David Malpass, announced earlier this year that he would step down in June. Malpass was nominated by then-President Donald Trump in 2019 and selected for a five-year term.

Adam Behsudi contributed to this report.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/XtZEK0y
via IFTTT

National test scores show decline in history and civics proficiency


Knowledge of civics among the nation's eighth-graders fell for the first time since the federal government began testing children under the current framework in 1998, according to new results that come amid a broader concern about pandemic-era learning loss.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress tests, known as the Nation’s Report Card, also show a 5-point decline in average scores in history.

Poor performance: Results from exams administered in the spring of 2022 offer a window into the state of academic performance in social studies following pandemic disruptions to learning, a bleak look regarding the level of understanding of the nation’s history, government and democratic processes. The tests are administered every four years by the Education Department's National Center for Education Statistics.

“The latest data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress further affirms the profound impact the pandemic had on student learning in subjects beyond math and reading,” Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said in a statement, noting the abysmal math and reading NAEP scores released last fall.

“It tells us that now is not the time for politicians to try to extract double-digit cuts to education funding, nor is it the time to limit what students learn in U.S. history and civics classes,” the secretary said.

Key context: Average history marks have fallen for nearly a decade with scores dropping 9 points since 2014 (from 267 to 258, out of a possible 500). This puts history test scores close to the 1994 score when the test was first administered under the current framework , 259. Student performance across all history themes tested — democracy, culture, technology and world role — all saw decreases. In civics, the 2-point downturn puts the average score in 2022 at the same level as 1998 (150 out of a possible 300). For both history and civics, there were widespread declines in scores across most races and ethnicities.

What’s more, lower-performing students had larger score declines than higher-performing students. In history, students who scored in the bottom 10th percentile had a 7-point drop between 2018 and 2022 and students in the 90th percentile had no significant score drop at all.

“For U.S. history, I would say that I was also very, very concerned, because it's a decline that started in 2014 long before we even thought about Covid,” NCES Commissioner Peggy Carr told reporters. Adding that she thinks “a larger concern that we need to think about is what is happening with our lower performing students across all of these subjects.”

Carr’s suggestions for improving scores: More social studies lessons for students. Nearly half of eighth graders, 49 percent, said they were taking courses mainly focused on civics and 68 percent said they took courses mainly focused on U.S. history, a slight decline from 2018. Both results point to a portion of students who are getting some or no formal history and civics classes.

“Teachers, practitioners need to get this content in front of students. When you look at what they don't know, and it's not just about reading, it's about content, facts, information about our constitutional system. Students don't know this information,” Carr said. “That is why they're scoring so low on this assessment.”



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/7l3aZek
via IFTTT

Wednesday 3 May 2023

Florida GOP passes sweeping anti-immigration bill that gives DeSantis $12 million for migrant transports


TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Florida Republicans on Tuesday handed Gov. Ron DeSantis another legislative victory after lawmakers signed off on a sweeping anti-immigration measure that will guarantee millions of dollars more for a controversial program the governor used to fly migrants from Texas to Martha’s Vineyard.

DeSantis, who is expected to announce a run for president in the coming weeks, has repeatedly faulted President Joe Biden’s immigration policies and regularly criticizes the administration’s handling of the surge of migrants crossing into the U.S. at the southern border.

The governor and his Republican allies contended that the newly approved bill will send a “message” to the Biden administration, while Democrats countered the legislation was overtly cruel and intimidating to migrants.

House lawmakers approved the measure after debating for 90 minutes, culminating with bill sponsor Rep. Kiyan Michael, a Jacksonville Republican who was elected last year, recounting how someone who had entered the country illegally had killed her 21-year-old son in a car accident while he was driving to the bank to cash his paycheck.

“The price of illegal immigration cost us everything,” said Michael, who won a GOP primary last year with the help of an endorsement by DeSantis. “There is not an ounce of malice in my heart … I just want it to stop. It has to stop and it is insane if we are waiting on Washington, D.C. to do something.”

But Rep. Susan Valdes, a Tampa Democrat whose parents immigrated from Cuba, contended the bill “demonized marginalized people.”

“Immigrants are people just like us except they did not have the fortune to be in the United States,” Valdes said.

Republicans have pushed immigration into the spotlight during the Biden administration, highlighting the thousands of asylum seekers that have attempted to cross into the country. Texas GOP Gov. Greg Abbott has bused hundreds of migrants to cities like Chicago, New York and Washington, D.C., straining city resources in those blue strongholds.

Florida also saw a huge influx of migrants when hundreds of Cuban and Haitian asylum seekers landed in the Florida Keys by boats in December and January, forcing DeSantis to activate the state national guard to respond.

DeSantis has repeatedly pushed anti-immigration measures during his time in office, starting with a push for legislators to ban “sanctuary cities” and culminating with this year’s comprehensive bill.

The legislation lawmakers passed Tuesday would require medium-sized and large employers to use the federal E-Verify system to check the status of new employees and mandates hospitals to ask patients about their legal status. The bill, S.B. 1718, will also allow authorities to charge someone with human trafficking if they knowingly transport an undocumented migrant across state lines. It would also prohibit an undocumented immigrant from driving a car even if they have a driver’s license from another state.

Legislators also set aside $12 million in the bill for the DeSantis administration to transport migrants from outside the state to Democratic strongholds and agreed to roll back a measure adopted in 2014 by Republicans and signed by then-Gov. Rick Scott that allowed undocumented individuals to be admitted to the Florida Bar.

DeSantis had also called on legislators to repeal a law that allows undocumented children to qualify for in-state college tuition if they attended a Florida high school for three straight years. The measure was adopted at the urging of Scott and was sponsored by Lt. Gov. Jeanette Nuñez while she was in the state House.

Back in February, DeSantis said that “if we want to hold the line on tuition, then you have got to say ‘you need to be a U.S. citizen living in Florida.’” But the proposal never surfaced during the session and Senate President Kathleen Passidomo said she urged DeSantis to drop the idea for this year.

Immigration advocates and other groups strongly condemned the bill, with some even calling it “racist” and threatened to challenge it in court.

“DeSantis’ political shenanigans will force every Floridian to pay a heavy price,” said Paul R. Chavez, senior supervising attorney for the Southern Poverty Law Center Action Fund. “This bill will push hundreds of thousands of people into the shadows, including U.S. citizens, putting freedom and even our state’s economy at risk. ... This cruel and misguided effort will negatively impact public safety and public health and cause harm to all Floridians.”

Republicans, however, defended the legislation. State Rep. Berny Jacques, a Seminole Republican who immigrated from Haiti when he was a child, told Democrats that he wished they “had the same energy” defending American citizens.

“This bill protects our citizens,” Jacques said. “This bill protects the people who are here legally and did it the right way. People like my family.”



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/YFPsoe8
via IFTTT

‘Corruption toll’: Federal jury convicts 4 at Chicago bribery trial


CHICAGO — Federal jurors on Tuesday convicted all four defendants of bribery conspiracy at their trial in Chicago that provided an inside look at pay-to-play politics in Illinois that prosecutors said involved the state’s largest electric utility and, at the time, one of its most powerful politicians.

It’s a resounding win for U.S. prosecutors in one of the biggest corruption trials in Illinois since former Gov. Rod Blagojevich was convicted in 2011 in the same federal courthouse, including on charges he sought to sell President Barack Obama’s vacated U.S. Senate seat.

During a month and a half of testimony, prosecutors sought to prove two former ComEd executives, a former utility consultant and a longtime government insider arranged contracts, jobs and money for associates of then-Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan — once one of the nation’s most powerful legislators — to ensure proposed bills boosting ComEd profits became law.

Madigan, 81, has been indicted in the case, though his own trial is scheduled for next year. He wasn’t in court during the just-ended trial but featured in much of the key evidence. The across-the-board convictions Tuesday may not bode well for his prospects when he gets to trial.

During closing arguments, prosecutor Amarjeet Bhachu called the four defendants “grand masters of corruption,” according to the Chicago Sun-Times. Defense attorneys argued their clients were engaged in run-of-the-mill lobbying and never crossed lines into illegality.

The defendants were onetime Madigan confidant Michael McClain, former ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore, former ComEd lobbyist John Hooker and former ComEd consultant Jay Doherty.

Jurors deliberated for several days before returning with the sweeping convictions. Bribery conspiracy, the headline count in the case, carries a maximum five-year prison sentence.

Bhachu likened the alleged conspiracy to a toll that drivers pay to continue their journey on state highways, and suggested Madigan was the gatekeeper. “It was a corruption toll to make sure that Mr. Madigan was not an obstacle to their legislative agenda,” said Bhachu, according to the Chicago Tribune. “And they paid that toll every month, from 2011 to 2019, when they were caught.”

Evidence in the government’s case included secret recordings of Madigan and others. Defense lawyers singled out a star government witness, ex-ComEd executive Fidel Marquez, alleging federal agents frightened him into cooperating, which included making secret recordings.

“We are here because the government scared Fidel Marquez to death,” Hooker’s lawyer, Jacqueline Jacobson, told jurors in her closing.

Marquez is awaiting sentencing after pleading guilty to bribery conspiracy.

Madigan was indicted in 2022 on charges that included racketeering and bribery. He’s denied wrongdoing. A year earlier, he resigned from the Legislature as the longest-serving state House speaker in modern U.S. history amid speculation that he was a federal target.

The indictment accused Madigan, among other things, of reaping the benefits of private legal work illegally steered to his law firm.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/tRj9M30
via IFTTT

Judge rejects Zooey Zephyr's effort to return to Montana House


HELENA, Mont. — Rep. Zooey Zephyr, the transgender Montana lawmaker who was silenced after telling Republicans they would have blood on their hands for opposing gender-affirming health care for kids, cannot return to the statehouse House floor and participate in debate, a judge ruled Tuesday.

The ruling came after attorneys for the state of Montana asked the judge to reject Zephyr’s attempt to return. She was silenced two weeks ago then banished last week for admonishing Republican lawmakers and encouraging a raucous statehouse protest.

District Court Judge Mike Menahan said it was outside his authority to overrule the Legislature and return Zephyr to the House floor.

Such a move “would require this court to interfere with legislative authority in a manner that exceeds this court’s authority,” Menahan wrote in his five-page ruling.

Zephyr told The Associated Press that the decision was “entirely wrong.”

“It’s a really sad day for the country when the majority party can silence representation from the minority party whenever they take issue,” Zephyr said.

Lawyers working under Attorney General Austin Knudsen cautioned that any intervention by the courts on Zephyr’s behalf would be a blatant violation of the separation of powers. They wrote in a court filing that the Montana House of Representatives retains “exclusive constitutional authority” to discipline its own members.

Knudsen, a Republican, issued a statement through a spokesperson saying the lawsuit was an attempt by outside groups to interfere with Montana’s lawmaking process.

”Today’s decision is a win for the rule of law and the separation of powers enshrined in our Constitution,” he said.

An attorney for Zephyr, Alex Rate, said an appeal was being considered. But the 2023 legislative session is nearing its end, so a ruling in coming days would be of little immediate consequence.

Zephyr and several of her Missoula constituents on Monday filed court papers seeking an emergency order allowing her to return to the House floor for the final days of the 2023 legislative session.

Zephyr and fellow Democrats have denounced her exclusion from floor debates as an assault on free speech that’s intended to silence her criticism of new restrictions on gender-affirming care for minors.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/WoNSKVi
via IFTTT