google-site-verification: google6508e39c6ec03602.html The news

google-site-verification: google6508e39c6ec03602.html

Monday 25 December 2023

Outgoing Silicon Valley lawmaker says big tech needs immigration reform


Outgoing California Rep. Anna Eshoo’s biggest tech regret isn’t what you’d expect: It’s immigration reform.

“We would not be the nation that we are without being an immigrant nation. And immigrants play a very important role in the technology industry. So many come to the United States to be educated here,” Eshoo, whose district covers Silicon Valley, said Sunday during an interview on MSNBC’s “Inside with Jen Psaki.”

"We have the finest colleges and universities," Eshoo continued. "Certainly, Stanford University, which is the geographic center of my district. But once they're educated, if they cannot get a green card, they have to leave."

Eshoo, 81, announced last month that she won’t seek reelection in 2024, capping a more than 30-year career as a member of California’s House delegation. She’s one of roughly three dozen House members who are already heading for the exit next year.

Discussing comments about immigration she made in The Washington Post, Eshoo also expressed regret Sunday about the wording of part of a 1996 law — Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act — that protects websites from being sued over much of the content that other people post on their sites.

“I think we made a mistake, many, many years ago. I understand what we were thinking and why we did what we did at the time, because the Internet was really nascent then,” she said of the law — but Section 230 meant “they [would] not be liable for anything.” And that, she said, "was a mistake."



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/nr6o7WB
via IFTTT

Sunday 24 December 2023

How British libel law lets bad people get away with bad things

English media rules are chilling journalism around the world.

from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/9WB6wON
via IFTTT

Saturday 23 December 2023

Trump vows a peaceful transfer of power if reelected


If reelected president in 2024, Donald Trump vowed Friday that he would turn over power peacefully to the next president after him.

In a wide-ranging interview on Friday with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt, Trump said he would peacefully transfer power to the next president if reelected, despite insisting in the same interview that he peacefully turned over power to President Joe Biden after the 2020 election.

Trump has been indicted for his role in trying to overturn the results of that contest, and he repeated his false claims on Friday that the last election was rigged.

“Of course,” Trump responded to Hewitt when asked if he would hand over power peacefully if reelected. “And I did that this time. And I’ll tell you what. The election was rigged, and we have plenty of evidence of it. But I did it anyway.”

Trump on Friday also said that if the 2024 presidential race was close, and there was one other Republican candidate left after the New Hampshire primary, he would debate them.



On the campaign trail this year, Trump has faced backlash for echoing dictators such as Adolf Hitler, most recently saying that immigrants were “poisoning the blood of our country.”

But Trump maintained Friday that he’s not a student of Hitler, and he’s never read “Mein Kampf,” the manifesto written by Hitler.

“First of all, I know nothing about Hitler,” Trump said Friday. “I’m not a student of Hitler. I never read his works. They say that he said something about blood. He didn’t say it the way I said it, either, by the way, It’s a very different kind of a statement.”



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/24HEVLt
via IFTTT

Friday 22 December 2023

Trump camp and Colorado GOP talk post court ruling steps


Top officials with Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and the Colorado Republican Party spoke on Thursday to discuss plans of action after the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to throw the former president off of the Republican primary ballot.

The call, which involved Clayton Henson, a former White House aide who has been a liaison between the Trump campaign and state parties, was confirmed by Dave Williams, the chair of the Colorado GOP.

Williams said that the Colorado GOP will appeal the Colorado court’s decision — holding that Trump was invalidated from appearing on the ballot because he’d incited an insurrection on Jan. 6 — to the Supreme Court. Depending on how the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, he said, the party would ask the Republican National Committee for a waiver to hold a caucus instead of a primary election.

In the meantime, Williams made a request to the Trump campaign.



“I certainly expressed to Clayton you know, Colorado Republicans would love to see [Trump] come out so that they can, you know, give them a good show of support. And I’m sure he’ll go ahead and pass that on to the president,” Williams said. “We would welcome him to come out but we understand if he needs to focus on Iowa.”

The Trump campaign confirmed the “check up call” to follow up on the Colorado GOP filing an addendum to potentially hold a caucus. The Colorado GOP has also been in contact with the RNC.

It is unclear whether Trump will make a visit to Colorado. The former president is expected to campaign heavily in Iowa in the runup to the Jan. 15 caucuses. He will then be campaigning in New Hampshire ahead of the Jan. 23 primary. Colorado is one of 17 states and territories that will be holding its nominating contest on March 5, also known as Super Tuesday.

Among Trump’s aides and allies, the Colorado court’s decision has been seen as a legal nuisance and a much larger political gift. Though the widespread expectation is that the ruling will be reversed or put on hold, the former president continues to face deep peril in criminal and civil cases across jurisdictions in Georgia, Florida, New York and Washington, D.C.

Trump’s Republican rivals and critics have rallied to his defense in the aftermath of the Colorado decision. Fresh fundraising pleas were blasted out to supporters. The Trump campaign sent out a list of 55 elected officials, political allies, and Trump-friendly legal experts ranging from House Speaker Mike Johnson to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) criticizing the Colorado court decision. And Trump, as he’s prone to do, leaned into the ruling by playing the victim.

The decision will play into an effort already underway to turn a Biden campaign attack line — that Trump represents a threat to democracy — back on the incumbent president and his party.

During an appearance in Iowa early this month, Trump called Biden a “destroyer of American democracy.” Trump argued that Biden was using the justice system against him, despite there being no evidence that the president has had any connection to the four indictments Trump is facing. The Trump campaign has distributed black and white signs to supporters that read “Biden Attacks Democracy,” and at a recent event Trump stood underneath a large banner emblazoned with the same phrase.

In the wake of the Colorado decision, the campaign plans to continue to lean into messaging that Biden is “against Democracy.” That will be a “big part” moving forward, said Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for the Trump campaign.

“We need to be able to highlight what Biden and his team are doing, disenfranchising voters on a wide scale, not just on a national scale, but in these states and what they’re doing is taking democracy out of the hands of the public, out of the voters,” Cheung said.

Biden has argued that a second Trump administration — and the MAGA movement as a whole — are a threat to democracy. And Trump has provided a fair amount of fodder. The former president has continued to spread lies about the 2020 elections, repeatedly downplayed the insurrection and recently said that he would be a dictator for a day if elected, if only to pass immigration and drilling policies.

Officials close to his campaign have discussed revamping the Justice Department to go after perceived enemies and purging the government ranks of officials who are at ideological odds with them.

The hope of these Trump allies is that the Colorado court’s decision muddies the waters for team Biden and provides team Trump with ample political ammunition just weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses.

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Biden said it was “self evident” that Trump was an insurrectionist, but said it was up to the courts to decide whether Trump was ineligible to service under the 14th Amendment clause, which bars anyone who swore an oath to the constitution and engaged in an insurrection from holding office.

“You saw it all. Now whether the 14th Amendment applies, I’ll let the court make that decision. But he certainly supported an insurrection,” Biden said. “No question about it — none, zero. And he seems to be doubling down on everything.”



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/lWL2XQ4
via IFTTT

DeSantis: ‘I wish Trump hadn’t been indicted on any of this stuff.’


Ron DeSantis said in an interview aired Thursday that Donald Trump’s indictments “distorted the primary,” depriving competitors of attention.

"I would say if I could have one thing change, I wish Trump hadn't been indicted on any of this stuff. I mean, honestly, from Alvin Bragg on,” DeSantis said on Christian Broadcasting Network, referring to the Manhattan district attorney’s case that claims Trump falsified business records connected to hush money payments made to silence affair allegations from porn star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential campaign.

DeSantis, who has fallen back in the Republican presidential primary, told CBN “someone like a Bragg would not have brought that case if it was anyone other than Donald Trump and so someone like that is distorting justice, which is bad, but I also think it distorted the primary.”

Asked whether he thinks that helped Trump, the overwhelming frontrunner, DeSantis said, "It's both that but then it also just crowded out I think so much other stuff and it's sucked out a lot of oxygen.”



“I think for the primary, it distorted. Yeah, I think it distorted," DeSantis said during the CBN interview on the campaign trail in Iowa.

The Florida governor’s comments served to frame expectations as he scrambles to gain traction with just weeks to go before primary voting begins. He is not only running far behind Trump but is in a close race for second place with Nikki Haley, the former South Carolina governor.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/F5pxuWB
via IFTTT

Thursday 21 December 2023

Murkowski slams Trump for ‘hateful, harmful’ anti-immigration comments


Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski condemned former President Donald Trump's recent anti-immigrant comments, calling them “hateful, harmful rhetoric” in a social media post Wednesday.

“With the exception of Alaska Natives and Native Peoples, most of us are daughters and sons of immigrants who came to this country to build a better life for themselves and their families. Legal immigration from people across the world is woven into the fabric of American exceptionalism, and comments from the former president couldn’t be further from the truth,” Murkowski said in a post to X, formerly known as Twitter.

“This is more hateful, harmful rhetoric from Donald Trump that is poisoning our country,” the Alaska senator added.

Murkowski’s post addressed Trump’s remarks at a campaign rally Saturday, where he said immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country.”



Civil rights groups and the Biden campaign quickly compared Trump’s comments to language used by Adolf Hitler during the Nazi regime, and the White House accused Trump of “echoing the grotesque rhetoric of fascists and violent white supremacists.”

Trump doubled down on the comments on Tuesday, telling an audience in Iowa: ““They’re destroying the blood of our country. That’s what they’re doing — they’re destroying our country.”

Although several other GOP senators distanced themselves from Trump’s remarks, few did so in such strong terms. Murkowski has criticized Trump in the past, and voted to convict the former president after his second impeachment in 2021.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/R17f38U
via IFTTT

Humanitarian groups urge Austin to halt Israel aid over Gaza operations


A group of prominent humanitarian organizations is calling on Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin to halt military and other aid to Israel over its operations in Gaza that they say have caused “staggering” civilian harm, according to a letter sent to the Pentagon chief on Wednesday.

The groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, urged Austin in the letter to “withhold U.S. assistance, in accordance with U.S. law and policy, that would facilitate violations of international humanitarian law” and “refrain from transferring explosive weapons to Israel for use in Gaza.” The letter, which POLITICO obtained, was also sent to Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Jake Sullivan, the national security adviser.

The groups argue Austin has failed to live up to his own sweeping overhaul of the Pentagon’s efforts to reduce harm to civilians in U.S. military operations, under the Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan.

“The Department’s response to the devastating harm in Gaza has failed to live up to – and actively undermined – the commitments set by the CHMR-AP,” the groups wrote, using the acronym for the action plan. “To protect civilians in Gaza and live up to the aspirations of the CHMR-AP, administration rhetoric on the protection of civilians must be backed by action and leverage.”

DOD spokesperson Sabrina Singh declined to comment on the letter.

The letter comes as Austin and Gen. C.Q. Brown, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, huddled with their Israeli counterparts this week in the Biden administration’s latest effort to press Israel to do more to stop the bloodshed in Gaza. Israel says it warns civilians before strikes and blames Hamas for hiding within civilian locations like schools and hospitals, pledging to continue operations until the militant group is eliminated.

Austin has recently been advising Israeli leaders to begin moving from major combat to a more precise and targeted campaign against Hamas. Israel’s operations have flattened much of northern Gaza, displaced over 1 million and killed almost 20,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities.

“Protecting Palestinian civilians in Gaza is both a moral duty and a strategic imperative,” Austin said on Monday in Tel Aviv, noting that during his meetings he offered “thoughts about how to transition from high-intensity operations to lower intensity and more surgical operations.”

While the groups wrote that they appreciate Austin’s comments, they added his remarks “appear detached from the ongoing reality of Israel’s operations, which continue to cause devastating levels of civilian harm and destruction and inhibit the provision of life-saving humanitarian aid – all using U.S. support.”

“The result is civilian harm at a massive scale amidst a humanitarian crisis,” they wrote.

Other signatories to the letter included Airwars, Anera, Center for Civilians in Conflict, Humanity & Inclusion, InterAction, Doctors Without Borders USA, Norwegian Refugee Council USA, Oxfam America, PAX, Refugees International, Save the Children US and Zomia Center.

In the letter, the groups noted that the United States is Israel’s “largest provider of security assistance and arms”; Washington gives $3.8 billion to Israel annually. They argue the U.S. therefore has a “responsibility” to ensure that assistance does not contribute to human rights violations.

The groups also argue that any human rights violations in Gaza by Israeli forces should prompt the U.S. to withhold security assistance based on U.S. law and policy. President Joe Biden’s own Conventional Arms Transfer policy, governing all U.S. arms transfers, prohibits Washington from sending weapons when the administration assesses it is “more likely than not” that the arms will be used to violate human rights, the letter notes.

Further, despite “well-documented and credible allegations of gross violations of human rights” by the Israeli military, the U.S. has never cut off any Israeli units from security assistance as is required by the Leahy Law, according to the letter.

In addition, section 6201I of the Foreign Assistance Act bars U.S. security assistance to any country where the government “prohibits or otherwise restricts, directly or indirectly, the transport or delivery of United States humanitarian assistance.”

The U.S. should also stop transferring explosive weapons to Israel for use in Gaza, in accordance with the U.S. commitment last year to limit civilian harm caused by the use of explosive weapons in populated areas, the groups wrote. The U.S. along with 82 other nations endorsed the Political Declaration on Strengthening the Protection of Civilians from the Humanitarian Consequences Arising from the Use of Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas in November 2022.

The groups specifically pointed to Austin’s overhaul of how the Pentagon reduces civilian harm, which he announced in the fall of 2022. The Pentagon is expected to soon release the details of its plan to implement the strategy, according to one person familiar with the discussions, who was granted anonymity to speak ahead of an announcement.

One objective of the plan stipulates that DOD will incorporate civilian harm risk assessments and “tailored conditionality” into U.S. security cooperation, the groups note.

They urged Austin to “categorically oppose” the targeting of civilians, “indiscriminate” attacks that fail to distinguish between civilian and military targets, the holding back of humanitarian assistance, and the use of “siege tactics to deprive the civilian population of items indispensable to its survival.”

The groups also cited Biden’s recent remarks that Israel has engaged in “indiscriminate bombing,” arguing that the practice clearly violates international humanitarian law.

The letter criticized U.S. officials’ claims that there are “no conditions” applied to U.S. assistance to Israel, as well as statements that the administration is not currently assessing Israel’s compliance with international humanitarian law, or IHL.

“Conditions ensuring compliance with IHL and human rights, including the facilitation of humanitarian assistance, should be the baseline of all U.S. assistance to any country,” according to the letter.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/Rn9hS76
via IFTTT