google-site-verification: google6508e39c6ec03602.html The news

google-site-verification: google6508e39c6ec03602.html

Saturday 27 May 2023

LSU White House visit turns into slam dunk for Jill Biden, Angel Reese


The Louisiana State University Tigers celebrated their NCAA victory at the White House Friday by acknowledging how much progress women’s sports have made since Title IX.

“We’ve made so much progress, and we still have more work to do,” first lady Jill Biden said. “As I watched, I felt the history of that moment of all the women before you who dared to be fast and furious, who ignored the critics and just played. I thought about every little girl who will come after how you show them that they belong on the court.”

The White House visit comes after the LSU Tigers women’s team won its first championship after beating the University of Iowa in April.

After the Tigers’ win, Jill Biden said Iowa should also be invited to the White House after praising Iowa’s sportsmanship. In recent decades, the White House has usually hosted only champions.

LSU player Angel Reese tweeted a link to the story of Jill Biden’s comments and said, “A JOKE,” along with three rolling-on-floor-laughing emojis. Reese declined an invitation to the White House but later said she would go because it’s what’s “best for the team.”

On Friday, Reese and Jill Biden shared a hug.

“In this room, I see the absolute best of the best,” Jill Biden said.

President Joe Biden, who also welcomed the team to the White House, said he sees “hope, pride and purpose” in the team.

“Folks, we need to support women’s sports, not just during the championship run, for the entire year and every season,” Joe Biden said.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/Fi7R89v
via IFTTT

How Ron DeSantis went from GOP prom queen to MAGA wallflower



This week, the rumors became reality as Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and South Carolina Senator Tim Scott announced their long-awaited presidential campaigns. The contrast between the two events foreshadowed all of the big questions for next year’s Republican primaries.

Tim Scott, who is a favorite among his senate colleagues — but who is mostly unknown outside of his home state and the Washington, D.C., fundraising circuit — preached optimism and unity while sharing the stage with his mother.

Ron DeSantis, on the other hand, did something a little different. He announced his campaign on Twitter Spaces with Elon Musk. But for many, the event’s glitchy start was more memorable than DeSantis’s stern message to fellow Republicans.

It was the perfect setup for the choice Republicans will have to make in Iowa, New Hampshire, and beyond: Do they want a president who follows in Ronald Reagan’s footsteps – one who is optimistic and driven by ideas – who shakes hands and kisses babies? Or do they want someone like Trump: a leader who uses the Internet to press the attack on the cultural issues that have divided the country.

Now, Scott and DeSantis join a crowded GOP field that includes former governors Nikki Haley and Asa Hutchinson; entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy; and of course, the dominant frontrunner, Donald Trump.

This week on Playbook Deep Dive, Playbook co-author Ryan Lizza talks about Scott, DeSantis, and all things 2024 with Jonathan Martin, POLITICO’s Politics Bureau Chief; and co-author of the best-seller, This Will Not Pass: Trump, Biden, and the Battle for America’s Future.




from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/dPAnyGF
via IFTTT

Farm-state lawmakers, climate hawks split on SCOTUS Clean Water ruling

The high court's decision marks a win for real estate and oil and gas corporations.

from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/muplWyO
via IFTTT

Friday 26 May 2023

Doug Mastriano won't run for Senate in Pennsylvania


MAGA firebrand Doug Mastriano said on Thursday that he is not running for Senate in Pennsylvania in 2024.

"At this time, we have decided not to run for the U.S. Senate,” he said, “but to continue to serve in Harrisburg."

Mastriano promised to support whoever emerges as the Republican nominee in the Senate contest. But he has signaled that he will continue to be a thorn in the side of GOP officials. During his announcement Thursday, which took place on Facebook Live, he complained for several minutes about the Republican establishment abandoning him during the gubernatorial election last year.

Mastriano and his wife, Rebbie, also said that their movement is not going anywhere — and that they will hold an annual conference for the grassroots.

“We’re going to continue to grow our statewide network across the state in every county,” said Mastriano. “We’re going to continue to be relevant.”

The announcement by the far-right state lawmaker will come as welcome news to Republican Party officials who were convinced that Mastriano would obliterate their chances of unseating Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) and harm down-ballot candidates if he were the nominee. Mastriano lost the gubernatorial election last year by 15 percentage points.

Even former President Donald Trump privately told Republicans that he feared Mastriano would hurt him if they shared a ballot in November.

Republican state Rep. Russ Diamond took to Twitter on Monday to try to persuade Mastriano to stay out of the race. He posted a text message he sent to Mastriano earlier this year, in which Diamond said that him being at the top of the ticket “undoubtedly contributed” to Republicans losing the state House in 2022.

During last year’s gubernatorial contest, Mastriano’s support for an abortion ban with no exceptions, his attempts to overturn the 2020 election in the state, and his appearance at the capitol on the day of the Jan. 6 attack turned off independents, swing voters, and even some Republicans.

Mastriano’s decision to forgo a campaign this time around could clear the path for David McCormick, a former hedge fund CEO and combat veteran who is being recruited by national and state Republicans to run for the Senate. Though he repelled general election voters, Mastriano remains a force in the GOP, winning his primary last year by double digits. Many GOP strategists believed he would be tough to beat in a primary.

Public and private polls have shown that McCormick is a stronger opponent against Casey than Mastriano, though Casey has led both Republicans in surveys.

Mastriano has suggested in the past that if he does not run for the Senate, someone else from his wing of the party might. But who that might mean is unclear. Kathy Barnette, who had Mastriano’s endorsement when she ran and lost in the Senate primary last year, has said she is not running in 2024.

Keith Rothfus, a former congressman with ties to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, is eyeing the Pennsylvania Senate seat. Carla Sands, an unsuccessful 2022 Senate GOP candidate, did not rule out another run next year when asked by POLITICO last month.

Mastriano said recently that he spent time with McCormick and his wife, Dina Powell, who served as Trump’s deputy national security advisor for strategy. That was a change from earlier this year, when Mastriano said he had not met McCormick.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/QXEi48K
via IFTTT

Trade once hurt Detroit. Biden is promising it will be different this time.


DETROIT — The decline of Detroit’s economy in recent decades turned this iconic industrial city into a symbol of U.S. trade policy’s past failures. Now, President Joe Biden wants to show it can represent trade policy’s future.

Motor City is serving as the backdrop for a series of high-stakes meetings with trade ministers from across the Indo-Pacific region that began Thursday, part of the Biden administration’s effort to fortify relationships in a region vital to his economic and security agenda. But selling Biden’s new approach to trade means overcoming a well of skepticism — both from trade partners who fear he is moving away from free trade and from domestic political allies like Detroit’s labor unions who fear he’s not moving far enough.

U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai on Thursday welcomed her contemporaries from the 21-member Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, a consortium focused on promoting open and fair trade around the Pacific rim, for the first of two days of meetings. On Saturday, Tai will join Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo for a ministerial gathering with the 13 nations the U.S. hopes to bring into the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework — an administration initiative to deepen economic ties in the region without lowering tariffs


For the Biden administration, Detroit’s symbolic appeal as a host for this global confab is obvious. It epitomizes the resurgence of American manufacturing that the president has promised, and stands to benefit from a torrent of federal investment in emerging technologies like electric vehicles and semiconductors. It’s a contrast from when the U.S. last hosted APEC in 2011. At the time, the Obama administration was aggressively pushing free trade deals and held the meeting of trade ministers in the resort town of Big Sky, Mont., a venue meant to showcase the “limitless possibility” of the American West.

“Detroit has experienced firsthand some of the most negative impacts of an aggressive liberalization of trade and deindustrialization,” Tai said Thursday, as the first official meeting of the trade ministers got underway. “When President Biden and I speak about putting workers at the center of our trade policy, it is not an exaggeration to say that Detroit — past, present and future — is at the heart of this.”

Detroit has steadily rebounded from its headline-grabbing bankruptcy in 2013 and swaths of the once-blighted city have since been revitalized. Some manufacturing has returned as the big three American automakers have opened or expanded electric vehicle plants in the area, and Mayor Mike Duggan says the push to return critical supply chains to the U.S. will give the city yet another boost.

“For most of my adult life, manufacturing was leaving Detroit,” Duggan said in an interview. “And you look at what's happened in the last seven or eight years, it has been remarkable.”

“If you look at where international trade is going, I think mobility is going to be a major part of it for a long time,” Duggan added. And as Biden brokers trade initiatives in Asia, Duggan said he is confident they will “open markets for people in the U.S. to create jobs here, and not have the effect we had a couple of decades ago.”

But for skeptics of free trade, Detroit offers a cautionary tale of the repercussions that ripple through American communities when policymakers simply throw open the doors to U.S. markets: outsourced jobs, shuttered factories and rising inequality.

“Detroit, in many ways, has exemplified how past trade deals — and the way that we have focused trade, by dominating corporate interests over workers’ interest — has meant the hollowing out of the manufacturing sector,” said Melinda St. Louis, director of the global trade watch program at Public Citizen, a progressive advocacy group.

Now those same skeptics are growing increasingly anxious about the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, particularly whether it will adequately protect consumers’ data privacy, prevent further degradation of the environment and enforce workers’ rights in countries with poor records.

A coalition of progressive groups, led by Public Citizen, rallied in Detroit on May 19 for the Biden administration to enshrine stringent labor standards and environmental protections in the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework — and reject provisions that help corporations to rake in larger profits.

“Detroit was the birthplace of the labor movement, and became this city of opportunity where you build a strong middle class that encompasses a large swath of the population,” said Charles Daniels, a senior campaign lead for the Communication Workers of America. “I feel like we're going to be the rebirth of the labor movement.”

Some members of Biden’s own party aren’t fully convinced his trade agenda will correct mistakes of the past, even as they argue that his administration listens to working people.

“The Midwest is where we have seen the worst impacts of bad trade deals over the last few decades,” Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.), whose district includes the area around Ann Arbor, said at a town hall last week. “It's great to see people's presence here, but I'm not interested in words, I'm interested in actions.”



The Biden administration has hoped to avoid such backlash when officials first pitched the Indo-Pacific trade framework. The administration has deliberately shunned the kind of traditional free trade agreements that voters in Michigan and other swing states have rejected in the past, opting instead for a pact focused on issues like labor rights, supply chains and clean energy.

And instead of unfettered free trade, the White House has touted what it considers to be a new model — a “worker-centered trade policy” — that gives labor and environmental voices more sway over the rules of international commerce. Tai, in particular, has made sure that labor unions have a prominent voice in U.S. trade discussions. Prior to kicking off the APEC ministerial meeting on Thursday, for example, she moderated a discussion with officials from United Auto Workers and the AFL-CIO.

Speaking to a room of top trade officials, the union leaders offered an unvarnished critique of free trade. United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain said “anti-worker trade policy has been the single biggest source of damage to the working class people in our country over the last 40 years.” And AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Frederick Redmond added countries, including members of APEC, cannot continue to undermine labor and environmental standards if that’s going to change. “If we're going to have a worker-centered trade policy, that's got to be fair for everybody. That's what we're talking about.”

The challenge for the Biden administration is figuring out how to entice foreign countries to raise their standards on labor and the environment and digital trade if they’re not getting any preferential access to lucrative U.S. markets in exchange. While many trade partners praise the Biden administration for bolstering economic ties, they also want the U.S. to eventually join a traditional trade agreement that offers foreign companies greater access to the U.S. market.


Still, administration officials are pushing ahead, hoping to finish the Indo-Pacific agreement by the end of the year — a staggering speed for a trade pact. And they’re hoping the gathering in Detroit will provide the talks with a jolt in the arm.

“The two big U.S.-Asia engagement initiatives are basically going to be put to the test” in Detroit, said Wendy Cutler, vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute, “specifically whether they can deliver substance and confirm or underscore U.S. leadership in the region.”



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/RicYUuD
via IFTTT

Texas lawmakers recommend impeaching AG Paxton after Republican investigation


AUSTIN, Texas — Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton teetered on the brink of impeachment Thursday after years of scandal, criminal charges and corruption accusations that the state's Republican majority had largely met with silence until now.

In an unanimous decision, a Republican-led House investigative committee that spent months quietly looking into Paxton recommended impeaching the state's top lawyer. The state House of Representatives could vote on the recommendation as soon as Friday. If the House impeaches Paxton, he would be forced to leave office immediately.

The move sets set up a remarkably sudden downfall for one of the GOP's most prominent legal combatants, who in 2020 asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn President Joe Biden's victory. Only two officials in Texas’ nearly 200-year history have been impeached.

Paxton has been under FBI investigation for years over accusations that he used his office to help a donor and was separately indicted on securities fraud charges in 2015, but has yet to stand trial.

Unlike in Congress, impeachment in Texas requires immediate removal from office until a trial is held in the Senate. That means Paxton faces ouster at the hands of GOP lawmakers just seven months after easily winning a third term over challengers — among them George P. Bush — who had urged voters to reject a compromised incumbent but discovered that many didn't know about Paxton's litany of alleged misdeeds or dismissed the accusations as political attacks. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott could appoint an interim replacement.

Two of Paxton’s defense attorneys did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Paxton has suggested that the investigation that came to light to week is a politically motivated attack by a “liberal” Republican House speaker, whom he also accused of being drunk on the job.

Chris Hilton, a senior lawyer in the attorney general’s office, told reporters before Thursday's committee vote that what investigators said about Paxton was “false,” “misleading,” and “full of errors big and small.” He said all of the allegations were known to voters when they reelected Paxton in November.

Impeachment requires a two-thirds vote of the state's 150-member House chamber, where Republicans hold a commanding 85-64 majority.

In one sense, Paxton's political peril arrived with dizzying speed: House Republicans did not reveal they had been investigating him until Tuesday, followed the next day by an extraordinary public airing of alleged criminal acts he committed as one of Texas' most powerful figures.

But to Paxton's detractors, who now include a widening share of his own party in the Texas Capitol, the rebuke was seen as years in the making.

In 2014, he admitted to violating Texas securities law over not registering as an investment advisor while soliciting clients. A year later, Paxton was indicted on felony securities charges by a grand jury in his hometown near Dallas, where he was accused of defrauding investors in a tech startup. He has pleaded not guilty to two felony counts that carry a potential sentence of five to 99 years in prison.

He opened a legal defense fund and accepted $100,000 from an executive whose company was under investigation by Paxton's office for Medicaid fraud. An additional $50,000 was donated by an Arizona retiree whose son Paxton later hired to a high-ranking job but was soon fired after trying to make a point by displaying child pornography in a meeting.

What has unleashed the most serious risk to Paxton is his relationship with another wealthy donor, Austin real estate developer Nate Paul.

Several of Paxton's top aides in 2020 said they became concerned the attorney general was misusing the powers of his office to help Paul over unproven claims that an elaborate conspiracy to steal $200 million of his properties was afoot. The FBI searched Paul's home in 2019 but he has not been charged and his attorneys have denied wrongdoing. Paxton also told staff members that he had an affair with a woman who, it later emerged, worked for Paul.

Paxton's aides accused him of corruption and were all fired or quit after reporting him to the FBI. Four sued under Texas' whistleblower laws, accusing Paxton of wrongful retaliation, and in February agreed to settle the case for $3.3 million. But the Texas House must approve the payout and Phelan has said he doesn't think taxpayers should foot the bill.

Shortly after the settlement was reached, the House investigation into Paxton began. The probe amounted to rare scrutiny of Paxton in the state Capitol, where many Republicans have long taken a muted posture about the accusations that have followed the attorney general.

That includes Abbott, who in January swore in Paxton for a third term and said the way he approached the job was “the right way to run the attorney's general's office.”

Only twice has the Texas House impeached a sitting official: Gov. James Ferguson in 1917 and state Judge O.P. Carrillo in 1975.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/y35Knti
via IFTTT

F-16s won’t be a ‘magic weapon’ for Ukraine, Milley warns


The military’s top general cautioned Thursday that F-16s won’t act as a “magic weapon” for Ukraine, but the U.S. is fully behind a group of NATO allies taking the lead on training and potentially transferring the jets to Kyiv.

“The Russians have 1,000 fourth-generation fighters,” Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Mark Milley told reporters at the Pentagon following a virtual meeting of the multinational Ukraine Defense Contact Group. “If you're gonna contest Russia in the air, you're gonna need a substantial amount of fourth and fifth generation fighters, so if you look at the cost curve and do the analysis, the smartest thing to have done is exactly what we did do, which is provide a significant amount of integrated air defenses to cover the battlespace and deny the Russians the airspace.”

Milley’s comments followed similar points made this week by Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall, who said the jets are “not going to be a dramatic game-changer” for Ukraine, though “it’s something that makes sense for them. It’s going to help them” in the long run.

Fighter jets are vastly more expensive than artillery rounds and ground vehicles, which Western allies have focused on flooding into Ukraine to help push Russian forces back in the south. Spending the money on those near-term weapons, as opposed to expensive warplanes with their complex logistical needs, has been worthwhile, Milley said.

“If you look at the F-16, 10 F-16s [cost] a billion dollars, the sustainment cost another billion dollars, so you're talking about $2 billion for 10 aircraft,” Milley said, adding that if the planes had been sent sooner, they would have eaten up the funding for those other capabilities that have put Ukraine on their front foot.

“There are no magic weapons in war, F-16s are not and neither is anything else,” he said.

Also Thursday, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin announced that Denmark and the Netherlands are taking the lead in the joint coalition to train Ukrainian pilots on modern fighter jets. He said Norway, Belgium, Poland and Portugal have also pledged to take part in the training.

The coalition plans to train roughly 20 Ukrainian pilots initially, although the exact number will depend on the countries’ capacity to support the project, according to a UK government spokesperson, who was granted anonymity to discuss details ahead of an announcement.

Ukraine will require a pipeline of pilots to learn the fundamentals of flying who can then move up to jets, the spokesperson said. To that end, the first stage of instruction will focus on ground-based basic training of Ukrainian pilots, who will then be ready to learn specific airframes, such as the F-16 and others. The F-16 training will take place at a site in Europe, Defense Department officials have said.

Left unanswered were questions over who will send their F-16s or other jets to Kyiv once that training is over, and what role the U.S. will play other than greenlighting the transfer of the aircraft from third-party countries to Ukraine.

The F-16 effort is only now getting underway after President Joe Biden last week said the U.S. would support training Ukrainians on the aircraft, a dramatic reversal from the administration’s previous refusal to address the issue, saying it was a lower priority.

But with much of the aid meant to support Ukraine’s planned counteroffensive having been delivered, and with increasing missile strikes on civilian targets in Kyiv, Ukrainian leaders launched a new public pressure campaign in recent weeks, insisting that the jets would be invaluable in air defense missions.

Dozens of F-16s are in various configurations and in different states of readiness across the U.S. and Europe. As several NATO countries buy more F-35s, the older jets will become available, though they will likely need upgrades and some country-specific technologies will need to be removed, according to R. Clarke Cooper, a former head of Political-Military Affairs at the State Department and now a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council.

“Based on precedent it should not be too difficult” for the individual countries, he added, since several of them have sold off their older F-16s already with Washington’s blessing.

The big question now for the NATO alliance is who has transferable planes in their squadrons or hangars that can be sent to Ukraine.

As fleets age and F-35s begin arriving in greater numbers, countries around the globe have been lining up to snap up the older F-16s. While there are jets available for Ukraine, several big potential transfers indicate there’s plenty of appetite outside of Kyiv for the fighter.

Norway recently sold 32 of its F-16s to Romania, and is waiting for Washington's OK to sell a dozen more to Draken, a private company that contracts with the Pentagon to fly training missions.

Denmark has also sold its F-16s abroad, most recently working on a deal with Colombia, and is considering doing the same with Argentina, a process that has caught the eye of Congress.

During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing with Air Force leaders this month, Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) said there is a danger of Argentina buying Chinese fighter planes if the U.S. doesn’t approve the potential Danish sale of F-16s.

“I think we need to be very vigilant on this,” Kelly warned. “We can counter their pitch here by facilitating the transfer of Danish F-16s to Argentina. That's a possibility. This is not just a transfer of aircraft. It has real geopolitical and strategic importance.”

Kendall replied he was aware of the issue and “it's working its way through the interagency process right now. But I think there is an understanding of the importance of it for the reasons that you said.”

The decades-old planes, while expensive, are in high demand around the globe.

“The F-16 remains a workhorse,” Cooper said. “Not only for NATO but globally, so it's not going anywhere anytime soon.”

Joe Gould and Lara Seligman contributed to this report.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/XLv1JIk
via IFTTT